I agree with @kjnodes @DuckDAO and disagree with the proposal. I think changing terms this late would be a bad precedent and degrade trust in the project.
I donāt know well how exchange listngs are being arranged, but if it is essential for it, then ok, maybe makes sense. Other than that, I donāt see a good reasoning, should just let the market sort ifself out, especially now during bull market.
I fully support this idea. If go ahead with the unlocking of the tokens, it will truly affect the price of LAVA and also suck out the life from the Lava pool on uniswap
Hello lava network is a great project.
nice to extendā¦with the vested resataked
I support this proposal. Extending the vesting schedule by 12 months aligns with Lavaās growth trajectory and ensures market confidence. Itās a strategic move that benefits both the network and token holders.
After deep dive . We will NOT support this :
Retroactively altering contracts undermines trust in blockchain governance.
Liquidity require sustainable solutions , not lockup delays.
Blockchain governance thrives on fairness and transparency letās honor these principles.
Tribeās proposal to extend the deadline by 12 months is currently resonating in the community. What can this proposal bring and what aspects particularly attract attention?
The answer is, of course, hidden in the investor himself and his ability (or willingness) to look into the future.
Tribe clarifies the rationale and potential impact of the proposal, and is evidently strongly aimed at long-term holders. Whether we are talking about delaying the massive token sale and pressure on the price (stability), or using the space to strengthen your own infrastructure.
I think thatās exactly what Lava is. A long-term project that goes its own way. I personally see the potential in the project and I am forā¦.
If the majority consensus is in favor, then I have no objections. However, I would like to know more about the projectās marketing plan. In which direction will it be heading? And will there be any additional fundraising to support the long-term operations?
Frankly, I donāt care what will happen. They raised a ton of money. Let them hold the board, create buying pressure. Why did they raise this money? We invested according to tokenomics. It doesnāt make sense to change this when the unlock is approaching. If you want to change it, you should give a refund right. I didnāt invest for my tokens to remain locked for 2 years. We are all here to make money, but for some reason the winning side is always the team. If Tribe Capital wants to extend the lock period, only their period can be extended. If not, we should be refunded. Lava Team should keep their promises first. Where is the CEX listing? Where is the liquidity? Look at the daily volume on Uniswap. Itās a joke.
I made my investment for the promised terms and the current situation does not satisfy me. This causes me to have distrust towards the project and the team. First of all, the team should take ownership of the project. The volume is almost non-existent, there is no progress in the project, no advertising, no marketing. Instead of dealing with all these, it is unnecessary and absurd to upset the investor.
Extending the token lock-up for another year will undermine trust in the project and the team. Instead, implementing a linear and controlled distribution to maintain price stability in the market would be the most effective approach.
As early investor, I strongly believe in and support this strategy. I urge you to adhere to the originally announced schedule without altering the roadmap. Fully blocking tokens creates risks, distrust, and instability
ā
please avoid taking this step.
I think extending it is the right move. 
more time we can lock more stable will be comunity!